From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 27 21:48:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA24440 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 21:48:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA24226 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 21:47:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA01308; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 16:10:21 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199801280540.QAA01308@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: John Polstra cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw patch In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Jan 1998 21:35:40 -0800." <199801280535.VAA29425@austin.polstra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 16:10:20 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I agree with Archie. It's best to avoid adding programs that change > their behavior based on the name used to invoke them. Why do you say that? I've often felt exactly the opposite, so I'm curious to see it from your point of view... -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\