From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 8 17:54:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5272016A697; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC4743D62; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:54:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost.int.ru [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.13.7/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k98HsrHE089102; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 21:54:53 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 21:54:53 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Ceri Davies In-Reply-To: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20061008215308.W89071@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: maho@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/85820: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:54:58 -0000 On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, 17:20-0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > Synopsis: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: ceri > State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006 > State-Changed-Why: > ULE is no longer the default scheduler, and no longer has a maintainer. > This is an interesting test case though. I think better mark ULE bugs as suspended. I have plans to take them over. -- Maxim Konovalov