From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Apr 14 19:01:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA04241
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 19:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA04222
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 19:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost.lan.awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1])
	by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA01631;
	Tue, 15 Apr 1997 02:03:52 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199704150103.CAA01631@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), jbryant@tfs.net,
        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: question about X.25 drivers 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Apr 1997 17:11:17 PDT."
             <199704150011.RAA19967@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 02:03:51 +0100
From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> > If nobody actively maintains X.25 then it dies, period.
> 
> Who is actively maintaining "more"?  Should it die and go away?   8-).

Everyone actively maintains "more".  X.25 is different - it's a bit
more tricky to test - especially if you havn't got an X.25 board :)

-- 
Brian <brian@awfulhak.org>, <brian@freebsd.org>
      <http://www.awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....