From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 15 19: 9:41 2000 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 19:09:39 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca [209.151.24.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DFF37B404 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 19:09:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from nox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (nox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca [209.151.24.6]) by lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA15065; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 22:09:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ottawa.on.ca ([2002:401a:9bfe:3:2a0:24ff:feac:5c52]) by nox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBCFw8k07410 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified OK); Tue, 12 Dec 2000 07:58:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBCFoJ807295; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:50:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (mg131-025.ricochet.net [204.179.131.25]) by lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA12429 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:37:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1]) by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA03155; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 06:36:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com) Message-Id: <200012121436.GAA03155@spammie.svbug.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 06:36:04 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com Reply-To: opentrax@email.com Subject: Re: Fwd: kyxtech: freebsd outsniffed by wintendo !!?!? To: dr@kyx.net Cc: tcpdump-workers@tcpdump.org, ethereal-dev@ethereal.com, snort-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, tech@openbsd.org In-Reply-To: <0012072118150Q.09615@smp.kyx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 7 Dec, Dragos Ruiu wrote: > > (Hurm.... Wintendo outperforming unix???!?? Something's > improper about this, and it ought to be fixed... :-) > Comments? Other OS numbers: more recent > FreeBSD versions? Solaris? Tru64? Optimization > patches? Can those OO MSDN lobotomies actually > be good things? Hurm... The Italian gauntlet has > been thrown down.... --dr :-) > > url: http://netgroup-serv.polito.it/winpcap/docs/performance.htm > I'm not sure if we could find someone of this caliber to run the test again. For once I must agree with Mike Smith ;-) Clearly the page: http://netgroup-serv.polito.it/winpcap/ says, "partially sponsored by MicroSoft Research". IMHO, it bait -- bad bait at that. IMO, M$ has found some hole in the FreeBSD kernel and is intending to expose it. Although I suspect the hole's been cleaned up by now by core. If Terry Lambert can chimes in, I know we might get some real answers. I'm not convinced by this M$ agent. Jessem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message