From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Aug 26 12:54: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from segfault.kiev.ua (segfault.kiev.ua [193.193.193.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE9537B401 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:53:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by segfault.kiev.ua (8) with UUCP id WUS47058 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 22:53:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua) Received: (from netch@localhost) by iv.nn.kiev.ua (8.11.5/8.11.5) id f7QJqjJ01833 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 22:52:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 22:52:45 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: function calls/rets in assembly Message-ID: <20010826225245.A360@iv.nn.kiev.ua> References: <20010824110805.C88259@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010825154427.B761@iv.nn.kiev.ua> <20010825160302.A559@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010825193335.C761@iv.nn.kiev.ua> <20010826021317.C92887@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010826021317.C92887@dragon.nuxi.com>; from dev-null@NUXI.com on Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 02:13:17AM -0700 X-42: On Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 02:13:17, dev-null (David O'Brien) wrote about "Re: function calls/rets in assembly": > > If gcc team wants to implement proper > > alignment to work with SSE and other high-specialized stuff, > > they should learn commands for bitwise AND, and use only where really needed. > Perhaps you'd like to send your patch to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org. I can send it. You can simply calculate what this patch does. It works for me, and it makes code for 99.99% of my tasks better. Are you suppose I'll get from gcc team something except rotten tomatos? > Perhaps you'd like to explain to them why they are so wrong about this? > You'd do that at gcc@gcc.gnu.org. They know all arguments I can say. But, except arguments, there are argument weights. Their weights are such that they think it will be correct to add such feature and spoil all code around with alignment needed for extremely small amount of one. And my messages shan't change argument weights for them. I don't want to talk with them. I want simply exclude this crap from my systems. Well, this will be yet another patch to my set of local patches applied after cvsup. > They have their reasons for this, and I'll let them explain them. No need. /netch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message