From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 07:10:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E2237B401 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:10:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.2u2.nu (ns1.2u2.nu [62.59.31.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E63943FAF for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:10:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lucio.jankok@2u2.nu) Received: from mail.2u2.nu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF3162D for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:07:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (atlantis.local.net [10.23.31.10]) by mail.2u2.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A375562A for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:07:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 3647 invoked by uid 109); 31 Mar 2003 15:10:30 -0000 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:10:30 +0200 From: "L. Jankok" To: Toni Schmidbauer Message-ID: <20030331151030.GA3637@atlantis.local.net> References: <3.0.5.32.20030331082034.01414bf8@sage-one.net> <20030331145541.GD333@devil.stderror.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20030331145541.GD333@devil.stderror.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: SunOS atlantis 5.9 sparc X-Sender: lj@2u2.nu X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interface collisions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: lj@2u2.nu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:11:08 -0000 collisions means half duplex if you don't want them, do something like this with your fbsd box; #in rc.conf ifconfig_bge0="inet 192.168.141.90 netmask 255.255.255.0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex" and your switch must be set on 100 fdx also. On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:55:41PM +0200, Toni Schmidbauer wrote: :On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:20:34AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: :> For the first time within the past few days, I've noticed collisions being :> the switch or the NIC is the culprit, so not sure which component may need : :you should also check if the nic and switch are both running the :same speed, or if autonegotiation is enabled. in the company i am :working for, we are always having problems if the switch runs :100fdx and the nic auto-neg or vice versa. on cisco switches its :generally recommended to disable auto neg for servers. : :toni :-- :Behandle die Menschen, als wären sie, was sie sein | toni@stderror.at :sollten, und du wirst ihnen helfen, zu werden, was | Toni Schmidbauer :sie sein können. - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |