From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 15 12:28:45 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA21373 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 15 Apr 1995 12:28:45 -0700 Received: from bigdipper.iagi.net (bigdipper.iagi.net [198.6.14.10]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA21367 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 1995 12:28:43 -0700 Received: from littledipper.iagi.net (littledipper.iagi.net [198.6.14.11]) by bigdipper.iagi.net (8.6.8/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA24907 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 1995 15:28:40 -0400 Received: (from root@localhost) by littledipper.iagi.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA02833; Sat, 15 Apr 1995 15:28:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 15:28:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Charlie ROOT To: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: libc.so.2.0 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello all - I was just scrutinizing my 2.1-current system and realized that I still have a libc.so.2.0 left over from when this system was 2.0-release sitting around in my /usr/lib dir - is this OK? Will files that get linked link against the correct libc? (Sorry if this is a stupid question)... Al