From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 1 12: 2: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1570F37B423 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (yogotech.nokia.com [4.22.66.156]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02946; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 13:01:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA04467; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 13:01:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 13:01:38 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200009011901.NAA04467@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Warner Losh Cc: Chris Stenton , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stable status.... still hosed In-Reply-To: <200009011825.MAA37118@harmony.village.org> References: <200008310656.e7V6uqb00584@hawk.gnome.co.uk> <200009011825.MAA37118@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > In message <200008310656.e7V6uqb00584@hawk.gnome.co.uk> Chris Stenton writes: > : Well I suppose it had to happen sometime. This is my first kernel lockout since > : FreeBSD 0.9! > > I don't recall FreeBSD 0.9. But then again, I didn't get involved > until 1.0-GAMMA since that's what was on the drive that Rod Grimes > sent me after prodding from Jordan. There wasn't a FreeBSD 0.X release. That was NetBSD's release numbering scheme. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message