From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 12 19:58:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA21272 for current-outgoing; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 19:58:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (garbanzo@haiti-107.ppp.hooked.net [206.169.228.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA21260 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 19:58:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA17562 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 20:00:44 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: zippy.dyn.ml.org: garbanzo owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 20:00:44 -0800 (PST) From: Alex X-Sender: garbanzo@zippy.dyn.ml.org To: current Subject: ELF binaries Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've seen some messages before about getting FreeBSD ELF support in the binutils, and a recent interest in egcs got me wondering. How hard would it be for the fbsd changes committed with the egcs stuff (so one can do dynamic libraries with egcs), or what kind of problems would I run into if I decided to grab a newer gnu binutils and use that? - alex