From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 10 07:04:20 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA09655 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 07:04:20 -0700 Received: from tserv.lodgenet.com (root@dial11.iw.net [204.157.148.60]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA09575 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 07:02:48 -0700 Received: from jake.lodgenet.com (jake.lodgenet.com [204.124.120.30]) by tserv.lodgenet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA02163; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 09:02:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jake.lodgenet.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA24988; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 09:02:54 -0500 Message-Id: <199507101402.JAA24988@jake.lodgenet.com> X-Authentication-Warning: jake.lodgenet.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6 4/21/95 To: Mike Pritchard cc: jspringr@tribeca.ios.com (Jeffrey Springer), questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pppd NOT AVAILABLE In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 09 Jul 1995 10:44:29 CDT." <199507091544.KAA19301@mpp.minn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 09:02:54 -0500 From: "Eric L. Hernes" Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > Why don't we change pppd with the following patch to give a > better error message? This question seems to come up a lot > here and in the newsgroups, and the current error message isn't > really very clear as to what the problem is. Or maybe even change pppd to modload itself an interface from /lkm/if_ppp_mod.o? > > -- > Mike Pritchard > mpp@legarto.minn.net > "Go that way. Really fast. If something gets in your way, turn" > eric. -- erich@lodgenet.com erich@rrnet.com