Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:26:09 -0400
From:      Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
To:        Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>
Cc:        Dionysos <dionysos@mercury.galaxy.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ports/19484: Port update (tik-0.87)
Message-ID:  <20000628132608.A8602@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20000628183937.A58070@cichlids.cichlids.com>; from alex@big.endian.de on Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 06:39:37PM %2B0200
References:  <200006270520.WAA82754@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000628183937.A58070@cichlids.cichlids.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 06:39:37PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> >  When all is said and done, am I to resubmit the diff output again via
> >  followup or submit a new pr?
> 
> followup :)

I prefer not to bloat the GNATS system anymore than necessary.  If
changes are simple enough and I don't request a new patch for them from
the originator, they don't have to generate them.

As in this case.

-- 
Will Andrews <andrewsw@purdue.edu> <will@FreeBSD.org>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ 
G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000628132608.A8602>