From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon May 13 15:28:56 1996
Return-Path: owner-chat
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA00915
          for chat-outgoing; Mon, 13 May 1996 15:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA00889
          Mon, 13 May 1996 15:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA10749; Mon, 13 May 1996 15:26:26 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199605132226.PAA10749@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: UNIX System
To: edd@aic.net
Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 15:26:26 -0700 (MST)
Cc: chat@freebsd.org, rnordier@iafrica.com, questions@freebsd.org,
        chat@allegro.lemis.de
In-Reply-To: <199605130942.NAA09869@aic.net> from "edd@aic.net" at May 13, 96 01:42:16 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > >> still wondering, however, whether it may not be called "Berkeley
> > >> UNIX".
> 
> I think there are no such thing as "Berkeley UNIX". If you refer to
> BSD, you have to write BSD (and indicate release), 
> not UNIX. Because "UNIX" originally referred
> to System V, again, IMHO.

The term "Berkeley UNIX" was used in the origina daemon book, and
AT&T/USL did not object to that usage.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.