From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 10 06:11:53 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93736106566B
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 06:11:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from decke@bluelife.at)
Received: from groupware.itac.at (groupware.itac.at [91.205.172.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2183F8FC18
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 06:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [46.74.88.234] (46.74.88.234) by groupware.itac.at (Axigen)
	with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 1EE5FF;
	Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:12:25 +0100
From: Bernhard =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@bluelife.at>
To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>, Ted Mittelstaedt
	<tedm@mittelstaedt.us>
X-Mailer: Modest 3.2
References: <20100418191752.GA72730@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
	<w2r3b0605b31004181554tb90de59u6df8ebd5b1206caa@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=nhk+eCG6kbe4LfeaTQWkKaVcr+Rx2LrKparDO@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110107194516.GA28544@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
	<AANLkTikvP8SezKEZYSUimaj3u8fkk2Vw6-aY09KV=RF3@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110107213643.GA32645@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
	<AANLkTi=2Nn8xeKudxb2uSR=aLx0GW43gVPCdL-=hjP7z@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikbuWJbtPYaLW=8BEH4f5oiumzEN6rgwOB5tC=R@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110109110022.GA10789@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
	<AANLkTik9Ckh2UAaed=YYbBFCP6yyd6kOmSXdEYmZPiEd@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D2A55F4.6010704@mittelstaedt.us>
	<AANLkTim0cfNkEEq7daR=iCD1kaKTpqBdMXavLZoJP3ri@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim0cfNkEEq7daR=iCD1kaKTpqBdMXavLZoJP3ri@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-ID: <1294639887.4466.1.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:11:28 +0100
Message-Id: <1294639888.4466.2.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AxigenSpam-Level: 1
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0204.4D2AA327.0137,ss=1,fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Testing Luvalley with FreeBSD as dom0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Bernhard =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@bluelife.at>
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 06:11:53 -0000

----- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -----
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt
> <tedm@mittelstaedt.us>wrote:
> So the point of my story is that I think a modern KVM is just as fast and
> featureful as Xen since they both have pci-pass-through and you should
> expect the same(roughly) performance on your guests withever recent
> hypervisor you choose.   Virtualbox is fast too, maybe even a bit faster
> than KVM but until it gets pci-pass-through it won't be as feature
> complete as the others.

The VirtualBox developers currently work on pci passthru support. Main pieces of code have just been committed after their 4.0 branch has been created. So we will hopefully see that with 4.1.0 but don't know yet if that will also work on FreeBSD.

--
Bernhard Fröhlich
http://www.bluelife.at/