From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 18:01:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9143616A41F; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:01:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oxy@field.hu) Received: from dumballah.tvnet.hu (dumballah.tvnet.hu [195.38.96.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B1C43D5E; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:01:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oxy@field.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dumballah.tvnet.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CD71018BD; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:01:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from dumballah.tvnet.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dumballah.tvnet.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17380-38; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:01:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from oxy (dsl85-238-73-88.pool.tvnet.hu [85.238.73.88]) by dumballah.tvnet.hu (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EDBA10184A; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:01:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <003a01c5fb58$3faca4e0$0201a8c0@oxy> From: "OxY" To: "Pawel Jakub Dawidek" References: <20051207165538.GJ53288@garage.freebsd.pl> <002201c5fb56$bff37590$0201a8c0@oxy> <20051207175359.GK53288@garage.freebsd.pl> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:01:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at tvnet.hu Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: geom mirror write performance problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:01:26 -0000 it is not possible to test it..but i think it's ok.. it worked great, the 5.4->6.0 upgrade is the source of the problem.. +> i removed the each disk from mirror one-by-one and ran the tests: +> (when i removed one disk from the mirror the write speed was ok, since i added it again, then they were slow.. +> it was no difference which disk i did removed..) >But the interesting thing to test is how they perform when you write to >both of them at once without gmirror involved. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pawel Jakub Dawidek" To: "OxY" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 6:53 PM Subject: Re: geom mirror write performance problem