From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 10 17:31:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307E7106566C for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solko@solko.sk) Received: from zmail.bubble.eu (zmail.bubble.eu [81.89.56.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15F88FC12 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmail.bubble.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15CE9C00; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:31:27 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zmail.bubble.eu Received: from zmail.bubble.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmail.bubble.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P5ZS7M3hzuP1; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:31:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from zmail.bubble.eu (zmail.bubble.eu [81.89.56.104]) by zmail.bubble.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6CE9BFA; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:31:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:31:27 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Sol=C4=8Diansky?= To: Freddie Cash Message-ID: <2060953559.1684.1265823087355.JavaMail.root@zmail.bubble.eu> In-Reply-To: <455013980.1682.1265823011636.JavaMail.root@zmail.bubble.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [193.87.17.5] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.4_GA_2040.FreeBSD_amd64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/6.0.4_GA_2040.FreeBSD_amd64) Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: All-in-one Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:31:29 -0000 ----- "Freddie Cash" wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Albert Shih > wrote: > > > Anyone knwon if they exit a zimbra ports ? > > > There is an experimental port available, but it's not part of the > FreeBSD > ports tree. You need to go to the Zimbra Wiki and follow the > instructions > in there. it is not experimental in terms of stability, it is just not that simple as "make install". but everything is stable until someone proves otherwise, right? ;) s.