From owner-freebsd-security Sun Jun 20 22: 8:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486CB14FEF for ; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 22:08:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA67288; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:08:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA95679; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:09:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199906210509.XAA95679@harmony.village.org> To: ark@eltex.ru Subject: Re: proposed secure-level 4 patch Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Jun 1999 02:59:37 +0400." <199906192259.CAA05415@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru> References: <199906192259.CAA05415@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:09:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199906192259.CAA05415@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru> -=ArkanoiD=- writes: : So rsh/rlogin has some use too. You can kerberize that services btw. Kerberized versions don't require secure ports, IIRC. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message