From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 12 17:14:39 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAF716A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:14:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762AC43D4C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:14:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id DD68414952; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:14:38 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:14:38 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho
To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
In-Reply-To: <425BC13B.11507.1D25687B@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0504121214210.30410-100000@pancho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
cc: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>
Subject: Re: Ports version upping policy?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:14:39 -0000

On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Dan Langille wrote:

> What about just "There is no maintainer for this port."?  Or do we 
> need to be explicit?

I could live with that.

mcl