From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Apr 12 4:30: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FCC37BAFA for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 04:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id EAA51091; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 04:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 04:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200004121130.EAA51091@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: kern/17842: Erratic user time reports for long running processes Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/17842; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: kees@echelon.nl Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/17842: Erratic user time reports for long running processes Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:29:11 +0200 On Fri, 07 Apr 2000 12:42:59 +0200, Kees Hendrikse wrote: > Tested on a stock 3.4-RELEASE, also tested on a stock 2.2.6-RELEASE. > Probably a bug present in all releases of FreeBSD. I've been running the program for more than 48 hours without an ANOMALY lines being printed. I'm using 5.0-CURRENT. Does this happen when you _don't_ run it with a high nice scheduling parameter? If so, then I suspect this may be fixed in 4.0-RELEASE as well. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message