From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 22 08:50:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7762516A469; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailout2.pacific.net.au (mailout2-3.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D46213C483; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.163]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BC5109A3A; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:50:03 +1100 (EST) Received: from besplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898F927413; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:50:06 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:50:04 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Nate Lawson In-Reply-To: <20070322182353.H13607@besplex.bde.org> Message-ID: <20070322194527.Q13787@besplex.bde.org> References: <200703161256.23996.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <53B52415C756A84E8A169F0E3673A32925FF83@IMCSRV6.MITRE.ORG> <20070319163113.GB96806@codelabs.ru> <45FEF6A6.30209@root.org> <45FF3239.7080808@root.org> <20070322182353.H13607@besplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:51:53 +0000 Cc: acpi@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] ACPI-CA 20070126 import X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:50:09 -0000 On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Nate Lawson wrote: > >> Nate Lawson wrote: >>> I think it's not the acpi-ca patch, it's the recent acpi_ec.c change. >>> Try it with rev 1.68 of that file. >> >> Or better, try with rev 1.71 that I just committed. Fixed a bug where >> we weren't re-enabling the GPE, which could cause exactly this issue. > > 1.71 seems to fix ec.burst=1 on HP nx6325. Actually, it seems to only fix the problem when the system is idle (or cold?). Building kernels indicates that the problem is still there by printing "acpi_tz2: _TMP value is absurd, ignored (34xx.xC)" message. Then idling stops the message being printed. No other messages are printed about this. Bruce