From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 25 1:42: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from extremis.demon.co.uk (extremis.demon.co.uk [194.222.242.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79B7914E9E for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 01:41:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gjvc@extremis.demon.co.uk) Received: (qmail 255 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Jan 2000 00:56:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:56:44 +0000 From: George Cox To: Alexander Langer Cc: David O'Brien , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0-release (ports) schedule Message-ID: <20000125005644.A221@extremis.demon.co.uk> References: <200001241436.GAA23651@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000124103710.B75151@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000124205021.B24975@cichlids.cichlids.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.1i In-Reply-To: <20000124205021.B24975@cichlids.cichlids.com>; from alex@big.endian.de on Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 08:50:21PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT (i386) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 24/01 20:50, Alexander Langer wrote: > Just FYI, maybe you can do something against this strict handling. > Or not, I don't know. Somehow, it's very good that the compiler does > this... Ports with such sloppy code should be patched as part of the port process, or better, have the original authors ass WHUPPED and have them be taught the virtues of using the compiler flags '-Wall -Wa-few-other-things-documented-in-the-man-page' on _every_ _source_ _file_ _they_ _compile_. End rant. gjvc -- [gjvc] In god we're trussed To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message