From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 26 02:17:17 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id CAA27780 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 02:17:17 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA27775 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 02:17:09 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id CAA21713; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 02:15:47 -0700 To: Matt Thomas cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big win for BSD/OS compatibility In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Sep 1995 10:13:56 -0000." <199509251014.KAA06744@whydos.lkg.dec.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 02:15:46 -0700 Message-ID: <21711.812106946@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > However BSD/OS 2.0 doesn't have dlopen or dlsym either. From the 2.0 > slicc man page: YIKES! That's what I get for making assumptions, eh? I just figured since they had shared libs.. Oh geeze. I guess I'd better get back to the Netscape folks, thanks! Jordan