From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Sep 10  0:39: 9 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A581537B422; Sun, 10 Sep 2000 00:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca5-129.ix.netcom.com [209.109.234.129])
	by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA13737;
	Sun, 10 Sep 2000 03:38:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost)
	by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e8A7c2d18306;
	Sun, 10 Sep 2000 00:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami)
To: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp
Subject: Re: Making XFree86-4 the default
References: <200009091343.e89Dhg411508@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000909171920.J2089@bonsai.hiwaay.net>
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
Date: 10 Sep 2000 00:37:32 -0700
In-Reply-To: Steve Price's message of "Sat, 9 Sep 2000 17:19:20 -0500"
Message-ID: <vqcpumcae9v.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>

 * On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 06:43:42AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote:
 * # Hi,
 * # 
 * # What do you guys think about making XFree86-4-* the default now?  With
 * # the split-up XFree86-4 ports and the xtt-* servers (which are
 * # basically 3.3.6 servers plus TrueType patches), I think everyone can
 * # have a reasonable system.
 * 
 * The only concern that I would have is about all the complaints
 * about 4.x not supporting enough video cards besides being generally
 * buggy.

I thought people with cards only supported in 3.3.6 can use xtt-*
servers.  Unless you give them some TrueType fonts, they will behave
exactly the same as normal 3.3.6 servers.

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message