From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 28 10:30:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456FC37B7C7; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:30:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm016-032.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.82.240]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA26742; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:30:25 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C747E18C6; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:28:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:28:18 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Visigoth Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new ftpd feature... Message-ID: <20000628132818.B8602@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from visigoth@telemere.net on Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 12:23:53PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 12:23:53PM -0500, Visigoth wrote: > I understand how IP_PORTRANGE_HIGH and all work, but there are > other programs which use these as well, and in at least my application, > having support in ftpd is nice... I'd have to agree with Visigoth here; system controls should be for EVERYTHING, not just controlling one server. Visigoth could use it for a short-term solution, but in the long term, I think his solution is better (in principle, I didn't look at the code). -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message