From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 15:54:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F09D16A41F; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:54:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A261D43D6B; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:54:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jALFtTPx094994; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:55:29 GMT (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: (from dunstan@localhost) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.13.4/8.12.9/Submit) id jALFtSgY094993; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:55:28 GMT (envelope-from dunstan) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:55:27 +0000 From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20051121155527.GA94958@freebsd.czest.pl> References: <20051119173235.GA75949@freebsd.czest.pl> <20051121094548.GJ20188@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051121094548.GJ20188@ip.net.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CALL FOR TESTERS] ng_bridge(4) multithreaded X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:54:06 -0000 On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:32:35PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > Hello, > > > > With Gleb's help I've written patch for ng_bridge(4) which makes it ready > > for running multithreaded. I think it would be better to let more people > > test it. Patch is here: > > > > http://freebsd.czest.pl/dunstan/FreeBSD/ng_bridge_locking.2 > > > > Comments and eventual reports from anyone who uses ng_bridge(4) on MP > > machine are welcome. > > > The comment preceding the ng_bridge_put() function should be > updated accordingly, to account for KASSERT() removal and a > function being "void" now. Otherwise, looks good. Thanks! Could you take a look at: http://freebsd.czest.pl/dunstan/FreeBSD/ng_bridge_locking.3 -- * Wojciech A. Koszek && dunstan@FreeBSD.czest.pl