From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 31 00:17:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EBF106566B for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 00:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A608FC08 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 00:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZt4j-0006Il-IR for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 17:17:13 -0700 Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:17:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1338423433564-5713525.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1338422534101-5713522.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1338422534101-5713522.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Why Are You Using FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 00:17:14 -0000 - Actually somewhat caring about performance too... (not like OpenBSD). - True unix pedigree, in mostly still retained philosophically. P.S. I'm not bashing OpenBSD, in fact, it's one of my favorite systems, just FreeBSD in it's default form/ src update route is closer to how I would like this system to work/ at this moment. Fully binary system with uniform packages/configuration has it's non disputable merits. Add to this no particular emphasis on performance and OpenBSD could have upper hand for me in that scenario. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Are-You-Using-FreeBSD-tp5713439p5713525.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.