From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  1 17:13:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DAD1065675
	for <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Oct 2012 17:13:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034858FC17
	for <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Oct 2012 17:13:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q91HDSTW066454
	for <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:13:28 GMT
	(envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from bdrewery@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q91HDSel066450
	for svn-ports-head@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:13:28 GMT
	(envelope-from bdrewery)
Received: (qmail 6745 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2012 12:13:25 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.74?) (freebsd@shatow.net@74.94.87.209)
	by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 1 Oct 2012 12:13:25 -0500
Message-ID: <5069CF38.6040003@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:13:28 -0500
From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>
Organization: FreeBSD
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
References: <201210011633.q91GXKPO079069@svn.freebsd.org>
	<5069C8FE.4040405@FreeBSD.org>
	<20121001170630.GF70616@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20121001170630.GF70616@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r305135 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
	<svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>, 
	<mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 17:13:29 -0000

On 10/1/2012 12:06 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:46:54AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 10/1/2012 11:33 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> Author: bapt
>>> Date: Mon Oct  1 16:33:19 2012
>>> New Revision: 305135
>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/305135
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   Mark as not ccache safe
>>>   
>>>   Reported by:	Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@gmail.com>
>>>
>>
>>
>> How is this not ccache safe?
>>
>> The WITH_CCACHE_BUILD support does not break any ports as it just
>> updates PATH, and I have been using ccache on pkg for months now fine.
>>
>> Bryan
> 
> I received at least 2 reports of users saying it is not ccache safe.
> 
> I manage to build it with ccache activated, but I imagine there should be rough
> edges and trust the users saying it doesn't work for them.
> 
> regards,
> Bapt
> 

Still this is odd. I wonder if they are using custom ccache setup.

-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
bdrewery@freenode/EFNet