Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 Apr 1998 12:27:22 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Netscape: Linux a top priority (news.com article) 
Message-ID:  <199804091927.MAA00524@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 Apr 1998 05:52:59 -0000." <199804090552.WAA10707@usr04.primenet.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > *quite* the same as the NetScape, which runs a full v3 LDAP.  The
> > > UMICH LDAP + Critical Angle patches + Terry patches is nearly a
> > > full v3 LDAP.  But there is little subschema support, and the
> > > NULL basedn support/namingcontexts attributes are not happy.
> > 
> > Sure.  But is it "good enough" for the things we originally want(ed) to 
> > do with it?
> 
> Well, that would be "Yes".

Cool.  Let's move forwards then.

> > > Oh yeah.  I have part of a getpwent/gethostent/getprotoent/...
> > > set of libc function replacements  done (the Linux ones suck, and
> > > they don't compile anyway, and they're LGPL'ed) so that you can
> > > boot a FreeBSD box using an RFC2307 LDAP server instead almost
> > > all of the files normally found in /etc/passwd (the ones that
> > > NIS+ can serve, anyway).
> > 
> > getfsent/getmntent/getenv... ?
> 
> I didn't do the fstab stuff, since it was dropped from the RFC2307
> code.  It's pretty trivial, actually, if you want it, but the schema
> for it is draft, not RFC'ed.

It's arguable whether it's worthwhile, but for completeness' sake it's 
better to than not to.

> In general, I made some code that took N schema entries and mapped
> them to N C structures.  That's why I said it was better than the
> Linux code.  8-).

8)  So is this something you're just doing for fun, or do you have an 
ulterior motive?

> I think moving BSD to one database is a better bet, for the long haul,
> but I could revisit the code, as necessary?

One database is desirable.  The "millions of files" approach was a sop 
to POLA, and perhaps we'd be better off without it...

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804091927.MAA00524>