From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 23:57:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FD316A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from brabys.co.za (postoffice.brabys.co.za [192.96.48.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C96C43D1D for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:57:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nelis@brabys.co.za) Received: from [192.96.48.37] (proxy-inner.brabys.co.za [192.96.48.11]) by brabys.co.za (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id i2O7u63m013704 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:56:06 +0200 From: Nelis Lamprecht To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1080114966.33376.276.camel@enigma.8ball.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:56:07 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Slow transfer speeds with U320 drives and HP Smart Array 641 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: nelis@brabys.co.za List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:57:09 -0000 Hi, With the ciss driver on my HP ProLiant ML350 I've noticed the transfer speed on my RAID controller is only. da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 135.168MB/s transfers da0: 69459MB (142253280 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 17433C) Both my drives on the RAID controller are U320 72GB pluggable SCSI's. The RAID card also has the optional 64MB battery backed write back cache enabler installed. I also have a AIC 50/100 Tape Drive in the machine which is connected to the onboard SCSI interface. sa0 at ahc1 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device sa0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 7, 16bit) My question is why the slow transfer speed of the RAID controller ? Does this have anything to do with the slower SCSI Tape Drive or is this a limitation of the ciss driver ? Or perhaps I have misconfigured something ? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks for your reply. Kind Regards, Nelis