From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  3 00:25:59 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1D216A4CE
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  3 Jun 2004 00:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-15.dynamic.qsc.de
	[212.202.50.15])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4723B43D2D
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  3 Jun 2004 00:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com)
Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com)
	by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1BVmbS-0001GH-OW; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 09:25:32 +0200
Message-ID: <40BED269.5030405@fillmore-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 09:25:29 +0200
From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
References: <200406022144.i52Lia74058841@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org>
	<20040603090844.30574032@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040603090844.30574032@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9
cc: FreeBSD ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Ports with version numbers going backwards: lang/icc
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: FreeBSD ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 07:25:59 -0000

Alexander Leidinger wrote:

> I'm alittle bit surprised. AFAIR I tested this naming scheme with
> portupgrade several times at the time we started to use it. I haven't
> tested this particular update with portupgrade though.
> 
> Any suggestion how to handle this?

An easy test would have been:
  pkg_version -t icc-8.0.066.p067.1 icc-8.0.066_1

Also, the latest version of portlint should warn you, assuming you have
a recent INDEX or run chkversion.

You can either bump PORTEPOCH, which is easy and allows you to basically
count version numbers any way you want (they you don't count), or try

  pkg_version -t icc-8.0.066.0p067.1 icc-8.0.066_1

-Oliver