From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Apr 24 17:54:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D150637B424
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from poseiden@inethouston.net)
Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B8F9710F410; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:54:34 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:54:34 -0500
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <poseiden@leviathan.inethouston.net>
To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>,
	stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: DEVFS
Message-ID: <20010424195434.A46742@leviathan.inethouston.net>
References: <003d01c0cd1c$08a6c760$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010424171639.A31074@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010424171639.A31074@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>; from brooks@one-eyed-alien.net on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 05:16:39PM -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Don't, it's broken.  It has no relation to the code in -current which
> works quite well.
> 
I learned that the hard way, shouldn't it be disabled so that it can't be enabled if its broken unless they are planning on doing work to fix it?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message