From owner-freebsd-bugs  Thu Mar 30 13:10: 7 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FDA37B732
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:10:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id NAA22288;
	Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:10:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200003302110.NAA22288@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mikko@dynas.se>
Subject: Re: bin/17694: wcstombs() and mbstowcs() unable to handle NULL
 argument
Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mikko@dynas.se>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/17694; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mikko@dynas.se>
To: bde@zeta.org.au
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/17694: wcstombs() and mbstowcs() unable to handle NULL
 argument
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:08:42 +0200 (CEST)

 <whine>
 But everybody else has it...
 </whine>
 
 Seriously, though: I have not been able to find *any* other
 implementation that does not support this behaviour (HP-UX, AIX, Irix,
 Solaris and Linux/RH6.1).  They must have gotten the idea *somewhere*...
 
 I wouldn't even have noticed had not the stuff I was porting started
 to mysteriously fail.
 
    /Mikko
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message