From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Jan 24 12:24:37 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F524F9EE4 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 12:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (pyroxene19.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "pyroxene.sentex.ca", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DNsd04FgYz3Cj5 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 12:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:a51c:ed2:8bf6:6079] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:a51c:ed2:8bf6:6079]) by pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10OCOZ6p004549 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Jan 2021 07:24:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Subject: Re: upgrade from releng12 to releng13 To: John Kennedy Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List References: <8e7a9688-b6ab-14b5-1413-c26e3cf99d0e@sentex.net> From: mike tancsa Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 07:24:35 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DNsd04FgYz3Cj5 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mike@sentex.net designates 2607:f3e0:0:3::19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mike@sentex.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.16 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.84)[0.841]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[mike]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[2607:f3e0:0:3::19:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f3e0::/32]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HFILTER_HELO_IP_A(1.00)[pyroxene2a.sentex.ca]; HFILTER_HELO_NORES_A_OR_MX(0.30)[pyroxene2a.sentex.ca]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sentex.net]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[2607:f3e0:0:3::19:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11647, ipnet:2607:f3e0::/32, country:CA]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 12:24:37 -0000 On 1/23/2021 11:52 PM, John Kennedy wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:59:07PM -0500, mike tancsa wrote: >>     I noticed when doing a src upgrade on a test zfs machine, I didnt >> get prompted to re-install the boot blocks after upgrading the pool post >> first reboot.  I got a whole mess of feature upgrades just fine, but do >> I not need to do a >> >> gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i as well ? > I seem to recall that they yanked that warning out because it was wrong > for UEFI systems (vs BIOS). As someone who reflexively once did that too ( -i 1 instead of -i 2) I think maybe using "appropriate index" or some other none specific number with the warning again, is probably better than having no warning.  I too always do it after an upgrade, but I suspect this will just create a class of new "damn, I cant boot my server after a zfs upgrade because I forgot to upgrade the boot loader" users     ---Mike