From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 17 13:32:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08BA10656C5 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C491C8FC22 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0AAC05C17; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:32:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:32:11 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20090417133211.GA68145@atarininja.org> References: <200904161900.42681.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> <200904162016.25524.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> <200904171047.56671.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple ports with some name X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:32:25 -0000 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > 2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg : > > And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco: > > both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco. > > > > cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco > > make install > > ... > > (i have deco archivers) > > pkg_add -r deco > > > > (deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco) > > > > ?pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco > > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages found > > (-1 +1) (...). done] > > deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6 > > > > pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\* > > > > .. > > > > OK, that's seriously annoying. That can't possibly be by design.... It is because misc/deco is not marked as having a conflict with archivers/deco, but archivers/deco does have a conflict with misc/deco recorded. If you were to install misc/deco before archivers/deco the situation would become obvious. One of the two should probably change their pkgname so that pkg_add -r can properly find it. Right now pkg_add appears to get misc/deco, even if you want archivers/deco. Opening a PR for both these is likely the next best step. -- WXS