From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 17 13:32:13 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08BA10656C5
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:32:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C491C8FC22
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:32:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 0AAC05C17; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:32:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:32:11 -0400
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@atarininja.org>
To: Chris Rees <utisoft@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <20090417133211.GA68145@atarininja.org>
References: <200904161900.42681.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
	<b79ecaef0904160852r55438408u8f6e2839d2d352d0@mail.gmail.com>
	<200904162016.25524.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
	<200904171047.56671.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
	<b79ecaef0904170245u1097f3a2q27e2d4b8ec9e402d@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b79ecaef0904170245u1097f3a2q27e2d4b8ec9e402d@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Cc: oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple
	ports with some name
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:32:25 -0000

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg <oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>:
> > And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
> > both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
> >
> > cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
> > make install
> > ...
> > (i have deco archivers)
> > pkg_add -r deco
> >
> > (deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
> >
> > ?pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
> > [Updating the pkgdb <format:bdb_btree> in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages found
> > (-1 +1) (...). done]
> > deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6
> >
> > pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\*
> >
> > ..
> >
> 
> OK, that's seriously annoying. That can't possibly be by design....

It is because misc/deco is not marked as having a conflict with
archivers/deco, but archivers/deco does have a conflict with misc/deco
recorded.  If you were to install misc/deco before archivers/deco the
situation would become obvious.

One of the two should probably change their pkgname so that pkg_add -r
can properly find it.  Right now pkg_add appears to get misc/deco, even
if you want archivers/deco.

Opening a PR for both these is likely the next best step.

-- WXS