From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 09:51:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E22070F for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 09:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96D91CB5 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 09:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ex7so3945708wid.14 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 02:51:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=OTuxEvvY3VC6TOOFjjiuZcTGuimPt0KEa18nmvy1veI=; b=lXTt2AyMuVpYra4Oo0lyLLJO0tK6s4GAta5b5QX5lQHxvybA/vzZMSF9XBiuGAmz8s nS25xb5JaKcbeXvi6xXP0DF8xNrHAslRfjQ46bo8BgJsdZ40W2Lhf9hlTC1yH0T3mjkY K/ngPzjpH6p5mOUewe5DN1/gZsSr9s0XjTvwx+G9OF2neWTLQshBgQpH/t0w3IKYDCq4 HQUO2ZQ6o6/gwySr4GcI1AOryw4VRWPjMn1/jnIZwJCv1rd2KXHPXMbnD13l4Pbjp1go gc5VBOSSkIu3pTrx70e+WRA7rSsZ63HVMYuQXYFbBBF0umBg5WbNoZftucFsId6PPbbF GsGg== X-Received: by 10.194.122.6 with SMTP id lo6mr41287346wjb.17.1410256289136; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 02:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y5sm14228881wje.32.2014.09.09.02.51.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Sep 2014 02:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:51:26 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Piotr Kubaj Subject: Re: Firefox 32 in Message-ID: <20140909095126.GL6096@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <540EA6B2.4090606@riseup.net> <20140909083643.GJ6096@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <540EBD00.3020100@riseup.net> <20140909090613.GK6096@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <540ECAF8.2090003@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f54savKjS/tSNRaU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540ECAF8.2090003@riseup.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:51:32 -0000 --f54savKjS/tSNRaU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:40:08AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > On 09/09/2014 11:06, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:40:32AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > >> On 09/09/2014 10:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:05:22AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > >>>>> Don't know how I messed up, I did a final sync with firefox 32 bran= ch > >>>>> and we now > >>>>> have firefox 33.0.b1 instead of firefox32... > >>>>> > >>>>> I wonder if I should bring it back or keep it as is. > >>>>> > >>>>> regards, > >>>>> Bapt > >>>> > >>>> I've just noticed that myself and wanted to notify you about, but it= 's > >>>> good you already know. > >>>> > >>>> I would just leave it as it is now, betas of Firefox are now quite > >>>> stable. It just needs too be updated more often and if you don't feel > >>>> like keeping it up to date at least until 33 stable, I guess you sho= uld > >>>> revert it. > >>>> Thanks for the update anyway! > >>>> > >>> > >>> Because I have no time at all to update on regular basis and it seems= that no > >>> committers have such time, I have committed the real 32.0 version > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> Bapt > >>> > >> You forgot about bumping PORTEPOCH. > >=20 > > Nope I did it on purpose, imho 33.0b1 didn't stay long enough so no nee= d to > > pollute with PORTEPOCH, now if I got too much complain from user I will= bump > > PORTEPOCH. > >=20 > > regards, > > Bapt > >=20 > Next bugs :) >=20 Committed, Thanks --f54savKjS/tSNRaU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQOzZ4ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EymYQCfQ7mbAB+81wfRxj12VsT2Fp33 avcAnjHrgp6v9b6GobOt9280uTsPhYAu =1rsq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f54savKjS/tSNRaU--