From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 17 17:10:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3849016A41F;
	Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:10:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from haven.freebsd.dk (haven.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D432443D45;
	Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:10:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2])
	by haven.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB9EBC66;
	Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:10:37 +0000 (UTC)
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:04:37 PDT."
	<43036E25.6010508@root.org> 
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:10:37 +0200
Message-ID: <18954.1124298637@phk.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/devfs devfs_vnops.c src/sys/kern
	kern_conf.c src/sys/sys conf.h 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:10:40 -0000

In message <43036E25.6010508@root.org>, Nate Lawson writes:

>Is it guaranteed that prep_cdevsw() won't be called twice without a call 
>to fini_cdevsw()?  Otherwise, the shadow cdevsw could leak when its 
>pointer is set to NULL.  I'm not familiar with this code, just asking.

There's a flag that prevents controls the call to prep_

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.