Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 03:31:16 +0000 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE3? Message-ID: <20110304033116.0759621b@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikUAPNaZeRtW94VwJz10aUzahztqNWfsUcB7-cq@mail.gmail.com> References: <cm7248-n2i.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4D6F634A.4030909@FreeBSD.org> <br0548-i6b1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <AANLkTikKgDNGNZZdNN7rUjMXxBWR_aucaAC1%2BXxYGSRe@mail.gmail.com> <he6548-flg1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4D6FF240.9060009@netfence.it> <4D700D2F.6080501@wintek.com> <20110303171608.766aede1@seibercom.net> <AANLkTikUAPNaZeRtW94VwJz10aUzahztqNWfsUcB7-cq@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:14:57 +0800 Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > "latest" when FreeBSD 9.X release comes we have to kick because > it looks very bad with > clang support, unless someone sit down for a long time and fix all > build errrors, but i believe > he give it also up. Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought the point of clang was to keep gcc, and its licence, out of the base system. Why can't the kde3 ports build with a gcc port?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110304033116.0759621b>