From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 21 00:50:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC7F16A41B for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A550B13C46A for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2F651931 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:50:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:49:59 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070721014959.2a166237@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <46A1068A.3010004@FreeBSD.org> References: <46A05B21.90603@u.washington.edu> <46A0711F.2020200@infracaninophile.co.uk> <46A1068A.3010004@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Proposal for another category in INDEX: common_deps X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:50:04 -0000 On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:01:30 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > FWIW, the -r option for portmaster only rebuilds those ports that > depend directly on the new version, not things that depend on the > things that depend on it. When portmanager was changed to work this way it seemed sensible. I've become a bit sceptical about it since I saw a post in this list that went something like: X always depends on A, B and C, so don't bother having your port depend on these if it depends on X. I wonder how many direct dependencies are omitted in this way.