From nobody Fri Mar 29 21:17:12 2024 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V5tXF2279z5FlX6; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:17:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V5tXF0LX6z4KW5; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from [192.168.5.3] (c-98-42-44-116.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.42.44.116]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 42TLHEqu091593 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:17:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-98-42-44-116.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.42.44.116] claimed to be [192.168.5.3] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------Ql0y0rg0l0GPNye91yfav19Q" Message-ID: <56f4fdc0-f9fb-4578-ae25-88bfc5aad9f0@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 14:17:12 -0700 List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: git: d22f15315b93 - main - devel/gmake43: Corrections Content-Language: en-US To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org References: <202403292007.42TK7lhI072363@gitrepo.freebsd.org> From: Yuri Victorovich In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7961, ipnet:198.144.192.0/23, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4V5tXF0LX6z4KW5 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------Ql0y0rg0l0GPNye91yfav19Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/29/24 13:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > As I have been told by other this is not explicit enough, an explicit version of > this email is: please revert gmake43 addition we are not at a point where it is > actually required. But should the users of science/nwchem do (at some point I was one of them)? With gmake-4.4.1 it builds for 20+ hours and times out. Try 'pkg search nwchem' - it isn't found. They aren't going to quickly fix the build. It isn't slightly broken, it is broken a lot, and has always been. With gmake-4.3 it is also unnecessarily slow, but passable. Are you suggesting to just revert the change, and make NWChem broken again? Could you please elaborate how is this going to make thing better? Is it worse to have one extra devel/gmakeNN version used to work around this problem and fix the failure, or to keep science/nwchem broken? Looking forward to see how is your suggestion beneficial. Thanks, Yuri --------------Ql0y0rg0l0GPNye91yfav19Q Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 3/29/24 13:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:

As I have been told by other this is not explicit enough, an explicit version of
this email is: please revert gmake43 addition we are not at a point where it is
actually required.

But should the users of science/nwchem do (at some point I was one of them)?

With gmake-4.4.1 it builds for 20+ hours and times out.

Try 'pkg search nwchem' - it isn't found.

They aren't going to quickly fix the build. It isn't slightly broken, it is broken a lot, and has always been. With gmake-4.3 it is also unnecessarily slow, but passable.

Are you suggesting to just revert the change, and make NWChem broken again?

Could you please elaborate how is this going to make thing better?

Is it worse to have one extra devel/gmakeNN version used to work around this problem and fix the failure, or to keep science/nwchem broken?

Looking forward to see how is your suggestion beneficial.

Thanks,

Yuri

--------------Ql0y0rg0l0GPNye91yfav19Q--