From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 16 09:04:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 443ACA8A for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.made4.biz (mail.made4.biz [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:c018::1:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 061A92060 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2001:1b48:10b:cafe:225:64ff:febe:589f] (helo=viking.yzserv.com) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1X7L8H-000Cco-Lj; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:04:13 +0200 Message-ID: <53C64008.2090804@dumbbell.fr> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:04:08 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block Subject: Re: openchrome on Chrome 9 HC References: <53C4E6F9.2010804@dumbbell.fr> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v1dxP9DnbC7ovciCK7UGFpnQ1EFQb0Qu2" Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:04:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --v1dxP9DnbC7ovciCK7UGFpnQ1EFQb0Qu2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16.07.2014 04:46, Warren Block wrote: > After a hacky bit of installing xorg-server 1.14.5,1, surprisingly > enough, it just now managed to start X with the OpenChrome driver. No > one is more surprised than me, because it was a partial install. There= > were complaints about it wanting automake 1.14.1 rather than 1.14. Which port(s) complained? > pixman has a plist error, showing 32.4 instead of 32.6 for a library > version, so it fails in staging before being able to install until that= > is fixed. Thanks, I just fixed it in xorg-dev. > I'm impressed. What is the schedule for upgrading the Xorg ports? Thank you for testing! I don't remember what's preventing xserver 1.14 from going to the ports tree. We forgot to record the reason on the wiki, if there's one. We'll discuss this again and maybe send a call for testers. --=20 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron --v1dxP9DnbC7ovciCK7UGFpnQ1EFQb0Qu2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTxkANAAoJEDnpl2Gl/ZTMZ1AQAKIJ6LG3dQF7knugAxPljIMr O98CSh25IpEentIC+z4/W4g3/7f/Aes7HRf14AeojArg0KnKAKmKxy2b3uCKdaD5 GA+BGknxBHiQ8m1ts50+TpQCu/Hrap3XvgxRR8bTsfLlJlv10VBFKULjCFjUJHK5 Jj88y/3ZnYEw2YxdynX17f11t0w6Aa5AMd421DjYN5UHfifyaWiPlst98hRRnnZt GtF2ZghAO7fG0D6+tUn0Rtljkbnj6xEqlWA6RCMmBkU9lcC2AZBb50S3V/pZv0Q4 Rw57xBykFLUHmKJN/WMVfyVsZCVivG1D7DIKIRaPpnrqLqWSuDNfyoczKvOMYhEL qBEHMcwZWMhlhAT4il6aCPe9W99kdBegnSJqWLz1P5LcCG0CA0BRIgBgzqV0zvHR ArlNEsrLpyTZ85rrGjetjk7Z/dEPN23ICItk6afhkzm8MJMBwx1FmSs7+lx0biDd MrKVnImOfggq/kZwg89MmLEek2TKTnaFQI4VTLNY0N39sfGo0iwysPJ2/+6JVC+R Sf8y1D/BDpEtZMfidgz8Mtxrdps/0S8GTrXdzKcj6cD5C6FOdjKindkOCTyzt3hX VHT3tiTFxcOuTl2kg80gC/g2VrQ6g++uM17JAuhFkJPslGdBCDhRYxa7UI15qEqx hOjOhaD0tru51v0nWwz1 =ly2D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v1dxP9DnbC7ovciCK7UGFpnQ1EFQb0Qu2--