From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 21:28:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA251065673 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: from kiwi-computer.com (keira.kiwi-computer.com [63.224.10.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 954E88FC16 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: (qmail 37477 invoked by uid 2001); 2 Jun 2008 21:01:28 -0000 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:01:28 -0500 From: "Rick C. Petty" To: Roman Divacky Message-ID: <20080602210128.GA36770@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <3b47caa90806011858y69b04edap806f34712c346b52@mail.gmail.com> <20080602075128.GA67510@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080602075128.GA67510@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Novembre Subject: Re: linux 2.6 on 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rick-freebsd@kiwi-computer.com List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:28:11 -0000 On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:51:28AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > > > I know that 2.4 is the default Linux kernel to use on 7.0-RELEASE, but is it > > possible to use the Linux 2.6 compatibility layer or the changes needed to > > run it only exists in 7.0-STABLE? I couldn't find any information in the > > wiki page ( http://wiki.freebsd.org/linux-kernel/ ) --- it was last updated > > in September 2007. > > you can use 2.6 emulation in 7.0R, although I'd recommend using 7-STABLE. Howso? I always get the error: compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 is not supported > I'll add some info on the wiki page that the information there is out of date.. > it confuses more than it informs That would be great, thanks! -- Rick C. Petty