From owner-trustedbsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 18 15:49:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: trustedbsd-audit@freebsd.org Delivered-To: trustedbsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE00516A40F for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson2FreeBSD.org@fledge.watson.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D2543D6A for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:49:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson2FreeBSD.org@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D0246B5D; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:49:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:49:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Diego Giagio In-Reply-To: <455F1732.9000204@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20061118154921.M50450@fledge.watson.org> References: <33453.36565.qm@web55503.mail.re4.yahoo.com> <455B89A5.1070607@gmail.com> <1b0798830611170822x15add173hfcad44ed830ec01e@mail.gmail.com> <20061117185840.P67585@fledge.watson.org> <455F1732.9000204@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:33:18 +0000 Cc: trustedbsd-audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Additional 64-bit token types to libbsm X-BeenThere: trustedbsd-audit@FreeBSD.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: TrustedBSD Audit Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:49:47 -0000 On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Diego Giagio wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: >> >> I think you should assume instead that people are generally busy but >> interested. :-) I'll try to take a look at it this evening. I'm still >> catching up from my trip to EuroBSDCon last week, unfortunately, from which >> I have quite an e-mail backlog. > > Since this is my first contribution I was a bit in a hurry for review. I > strongly apologize. There's no need to apologize, and your contribution is much appreciated :-). Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge