From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Sep  9 21:51:33 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA16308
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 9 Sep 1995 21:51:33 -0700
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (sri.MT.net [204.94.231.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA16302
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 9 Sep 1995 21:51:31 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA29003; Sat, 9 Sep 1995 22:53:40 -0600
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 22:53:40 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199509100453.WAA29003@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: davidg@Root.COM
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GUS Max support in -stable? 
In-Reply-To: <199509100151.SAA00714@corbin.Root.COM>
References: <199509100136.TAA28763@rocky.sri.MT.net>
	<199509100151.SAA00714@corbin.Root.COM>
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> >This is strange.  This sounds rather naive, but how does config know
> >which include files to generate?  It no longer generates 'gusmax.h', and
> >I'm not sure how it determines which include files to generate.
> 
>    It's based on the "files" file. Each 'optional' will cause a .h file
> to be generated. There are two "files" files - /sys/conf/files and
> /sys/i386/conf/files.i386.

I thought so, but I didn't see any mention of gusmax in any of the
files, and my 2.0.5 box is off-line now I couldn't verify it.

Hopefully we'll get this figured out before 2.1 releases. ;)


Nate