From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jul 20 14:47:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA04113 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Wicked.eaznet.com ([206.62.254.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA04108 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wicked.eaznet.com ([206.62.254.145]) by Wicked.eaznet.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA07323; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:48:40 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <33D28822.17354A0@eaznet.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:50:26 -0700 From: Eddie Fry Organization: Creative Solutions X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b4 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Blayzor , isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmaster 3 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <199707201708.NAA12013@nimbus.superior.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Robert, We were using 3.5.1b8 for a couple of weeks but kept having problems with ports locking up. Livingston had us upgrade from there. Eddie Robert Blayzor wrote: > > I have a confusing problem. I've recently > installed a PM3 with > ComOS > > 3.5.1b20 on a channelized T-1. A lot of my > customers now complain > that > > they keep getting disconnected from the > network or they get messages > > when they log in that they cannot establish a > network connection. > We > > were previously using a USR Total Control and > these customers had no > > problems. Does anybody have any ideas? > > Same problem here, it's the beta. The best > ComOS for channelized T1 > that > I've found so far to be the most stable is > beta8, but thats just us. > We > have similar problems. Hopefully with the > release of the K56flex > stuff, > these problems will disappear. > > -- > Robert Blayzor robert@superior.net > Telecon > Communications > CIS Manager/SysAdmin Network > Engineer 131 Enterprise > Rd. > Superior Net Services > 518-762-3456 Johnstown, NY > 12095 > "FreeBSD! Turning PC's into > Workstations!"