Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:06:19 +0000 From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: nick@garage.freebsd.pl Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame Message-ID: <E1Aglf1-0003pp-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040112124521.GE74246@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <40007D14.6090205@freebsd.org> <400135EA.8050603@energyhq.es.eu.org> <400135EA.8050603@energyhq.es.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> wrote: > >I'm working on one geom class (called for now geom_raid) which will support >transformations like: concatenation, stripe (raid0), mirror (raid1), raid4 >and raid5. Isn't is more GEOMish to have a separate GEOM class for each transformation? Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ SHANNON: NORTHWEST BACKING SOUTHWEST 6 TO GALE 8. SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1Aglf1-0003pp-00>