From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Jun 18 17:20:05 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC9CA78D04
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C7C14A1
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id EF926A78D03; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF335A78D02
 for <ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B662314A0
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1bEJuf-0005PT-KF; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:20:05 +0200
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:20:05 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different
 compared to 10,3 compiler?
Message-ID: <20160618172005.GA19494@home.opsec.eu>
References: <64e51a34-fced-4f7f-2a3f-9508c6c24b39@rawbw.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <64e51a34-fced-4f7f-2a3f-9508c6c24b39@rawbw.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:20:05 -0000

Hi!

> There are two questions:
> 1. Why clang36 works differently on 10.1 and 10.3?

Good question. Additional patches went into 10.3, probably ?

> 2. Should 10.3 be used for central builds then?

For a major release, the ports are always build using the oldest
supported minor release, because in general, the binaries are
binary compatible with newer releases, but sometimes not the
other way around.

https://www.freebsd.org/ says:

Production: 10.3, 10.1, 9.3

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         4 years to go !