Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:20:05 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why central builds are performed on 10.1 with broken/different compared to 10,3 compiler? Message-ID: <20160618172005.GA19494@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <64e51a34-fced-4f7f-2a3f-9508c6c24b39@rawbw.com> References: <64e51a34-fced-4f7f-2a3f-9508c6c24b39@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > There are two questions: > 1. Why clang36 works differently on 10.1 and 10.3? Good question. Additional patches went into 10.3, probably ? > 2. Should 10.3 be used for central builds then? For a major release, the ports are always build using the oldest supported minor release, because in general, the binaries are binary compatible with newer releases, but sometimes not the other way around. https://www.freebsd.org/ says: Production: 10.3, 10.1, 9.3 -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160618172005.GA19494>