From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 11 15:21:05 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA20938 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 15:21:05 -0700 Received: from rah.star-gate.com (bettina.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA20928 ; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 15:21:03 -0700 Received: from localhost.v-site.net (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA02703; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 15:08:29 -0700 Message-Id: <199506112208.PAA02703@rah.star-gate.com> X-Authentication-Warning: rah.star-gate.com: Host localhost.v-site.net didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6delta 4/7/95 To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: Nate Williams , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: performance... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jun 1995 14:55:49 PDT." <199506112155.OAA19996@freefall.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 11 Jun 1995 15:08:29 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>> "Justin T. Gibbs" said: > >> and on the early days of FreeBSD 2.0 it was > >> like 13 minutes or so. I now that this is not very > >> scientific . > > > >Hmm, this one is hard to understand. > > > > Merged VM/Buffer Cache. > Perhaps better page trimming algorithm for processes? VMS had a nice process memory page controlling algorithm, number of pages to add or delete based on the rate of paging, etc.. and tunable... Amancio