From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 16 12:04:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C36F4C47 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1A12010 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s6GC4YTZ094495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:04:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s6GC4YcV094492; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:04:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:04:34 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= Subject: Re: openchrome on Chrome 9 HC In-Reply-To: <53C64008.2090804@dumbbell.fr> Message-ID: References: <53C4E6F9.2010804@dumbbell.fr> <53C64008.2090804@dumbbell.fr> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:04:34 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:04:41 -0000 On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote: > On 16.07.2014 04:46, Warren Block wrote: >> After a hacky bit of installing xorg-server 1.14.5,1, surprisingly >> enough, it just now managed to start X with the OpenChrome driver. No >> one is more surprised than me, because it was a partial install. There >> were complaints about it wanting automake 1.14.1 rather than 1.14. > > Which port(s) complained? fontsproto and xorg-server (as far as I recall) but I suspect now that was because the CMOS battery was dead and the date defaulted to 2002. After setting the date, they built. x11-fonts/libXfont does not build, showing: checking for XFONT... configure: error: Package requirements (xproto xtrans fontsproto < 2.1.3 fontenc) were not met: Package dependency requirement 'fontsproto < 2.1.3' could not be satisfied. Package 'fontsproto' has version '2.1.3', required version is '< 2.1.3' That might also be an artifact. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 16 12:52:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FAB1EDC for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14CD9254B for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id nu7so859383obb.28 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 05:52:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=y1rNja+q88JnX0xNLjGpsy3O9cLQrEmv2AUiJRhL21I=; b=hKswMHPXI3Yd1vulGHD2zXX1rf9eT5cm0k0HxY0XXUlMuce4s0UDEjcnUwgtPiK7vo xKmYHJywoEi5XMBEKIoGRDiXC/ZK+Y0ILWWt9O+l5FG7LxSRalaEBSBWh3Q00okAfKoi a1y5bT8SC+C+Z5TI/AcGi54EpZqmu+s+wTUir6Go7Qk/nAPWBeAbSev7duWmfcXGXl+k jaQn2uxwXXLvKN0IL14/FCHCSVgVsmPvRIEZNopQZZaG574e0Sia9r8NESUcHGpqs+Qu Nnk+7/Bu/S/xGHc7wBDhd9Ug8OJcm3QntEmZXdYPuHlrE/O8nIpsbeFB2DCYkfvZKnUh W70w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.81.99 with SMTP id z3mr20415192obx.79.1405515143148; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 05:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.170.39 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 05:52:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <53C4E6F9.2010804@dumbbell.fr> <53C64008.2090804@dumbbell.fr> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:52:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openchrome on Chrome 9 HC From: Andreas Nilsson To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:52:25 -0000 On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron wrote: > > On 16.07.2014 04:46, Warren Block wrote: >> >>> After a hacky bit of installing xorg-server 1.14.5,1, surprisingly >>> enough, it just now managed to start X with the OpenChrome driver. No >>> one is more surprised than me, because it was a partial install. There >>> were complaints about it wanting automake 1.14.1 rather than 1.14. >>> >> >> Which port(s) complained? >> > > fontsproto and xorg-server (as far as I recall) but I suspect now that wa= s > because the CMOS battery was dead and the date defaulted to 2002. After > setting the date, they built. > > x11-fonts/libXfont does not build, showing: > > checking for XFONT... configure: error: Package requirements (xproto > xtrans fontsproto < 2.1.3 fontenc) were not met: > Package dependency requirement 'fontsproto < 2.1.3' could not be > satisfied. > Package 'fontsproto' has version '2.1.3', required version is '< 2.1.3' > > That might also be an artifact. > > I think not. I see it on amd64 as well. Seems fix is to s/=3D/g Best regards Andreas