From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 24 12:03:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 5A962C69; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:03:16 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Ryan Steinmetz Subject: Re: svn commit: r321677 - in head/security/duo: . files Message-ID: <20130624120316.GB79369@FreeBSD.org> References: <201306241155.r5OBtgQj057667@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201306241155.r5OBtgQj057667@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:03:16 -0000 On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:55:42AM +0000, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: > New Revision: 321677 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/321677 > > +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 1000000 > +USE_GCC= yes > +.endif Presuming it's due to Clang... Two quick questions: 1) why not just say USE_GCC=any; and 2) how hard would it be to fix Clang fallouts, and remove any explicit compiler requirement? Note that =yes implies GCC 4.6+ or something, yet on OSVERSION < 1000000 apparently our default system 4.2 is enough. > @${CAT} ${PKGMESSAGE} It would be nice if cat(1) had been surrounded with ${ECHO_MSG}'s to ensure consistent padding when installing from package vs. ports. If any padding is present in the pkg-message file itself, it should be removed. ./danfe