From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb 24 20:00:57 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA18880
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 20:00:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA18875
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 20:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA19853; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 20:59:59 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 20:59:59 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199702250359.UAA19853@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Jimbo Bahooli <moke@fools.ecpnet.com>,
        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: anoncvs server 
In-Reply-To: <4685.856840962@time.cdrom.com>
References: <199702250236.TAA19435@rocky.mt.sri.com>
	<4685.856840962@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > I *certainly* don't speak for core, but anoncvs is a *huge*
> > networking/CPU load, much more than CVSup and the CPU load is *much*
> > higher than SUP (though the network load can be better than SUP).
> 
> Well, I have a server I can run it on (and it's not on any of our
> machines :-) so it's more a matter of waiting for CVS to DTRT.

And that would be?


Nate